Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Gibbins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. The debate of Keep vs. Merge can be done without an AfD. Deathphoenix ʕ 21:54, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Looks like this was already merged and redirect here. I'm going to have to send a nice message to Kingboyk about closing AfDs. --Deathphoenix ʕ 21:56, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

(Added just after closure). Err... I wasn't an admin at the time. I simply boldly edited. If I'd closed the AFD then other editors might (rightly) have said I was jumping the gun somewhat. --kingboyk 22:03, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Discussion continues on Kingboyk's talk page. --Deathphoenix ʕ 22:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mike Gibbins

This is essentially a news story, not a biographical article. Mike Gibbins' historical relevance is sufficiently covered and applicable within the Badfinger article. ZincOrbie 23:07, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - Although lacking in its current form as a stub, the subject does have biographical potential. Sulfur 03:26, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or merge with Badfinger. Kappa
• Keep Member of a notable band Nigelthefish 14:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Badfinger as has already been done with Pete Ham. Both guys are very notable, but they are notable as members of Badfinger. I'll be bold and merge it now, which of course can be undone if concensus dictates. --kingboyk 00:47, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.