Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Bishop

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. JeremyA 21:01, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mike Bishop

This article has been up for an explain-significance for two weeks with no edits since. I vfd'd it because of this inactivity and also the dubious authorship of the first poster - it's an anonymous IP with a long history of vandalism. Googling for "Mike Bishop" + "Skatenstone" (his alleged skateboard ramp company) returns 0 hits. Googling "Mike Bishop" + "Route 215" (his alleged ex-band) returns 0 hits. For vanity, unverified info, and non-notability, I nominate this for deletion. jglc | t | c 16:52, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per Jasonglchu. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 17:30, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete ASAP. Deb 17:55, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: If every claim on it were true, it would make him just some dude. Geogre 18:45, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - vanity. Blackcats 20:28, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. JamesBurns 06:04, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• You should redirect to Michael Bishop after you delete it. Gdr 17:27, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.