Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Barrett (politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mike Barrett (politician)

Mike Barrett (politician) (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links)

Political candidate who lost, no other notability offered Nuttah68 08:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, I don't see many relevant Google hits to this person. Unless this article is properly sourced and expanded, then I believe this has to go. At its current state, I don't see the article meeting WP:BIO guidelines. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 08:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 08:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. He lost by a 70-29 margin. That sure means non-notable to me. Spinach Dip 10:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Well some losers can be notable, if the totality of their career warrants it. This candidate has very little to go on. Montco 03:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. Notable and certainly verifiable. Note that the high-traffic election site www.electoral-vote.com started linking to our articles on both incumbents AND challengers for congressional seats this year; it's a sign that coverage of congressional challengers here is already EXPECTED by the world outside AfD. Unfocused 05:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.