Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Abundo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was USERFY and DELETE. -Splashtalk 00:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mike Abundo

Vanity article, created by User:Mikeabundo. Barely asserts notability. Coffee 10:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete or userify. Google has about 14,000 hits on the term mike+abundo but most of the relevant entries are from Abundo's own websites and from one text that has been reposted in many blogs. Noelle De Guzman (talk) 11:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 14:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Userify. As per Noelle. --Noypi380 05:10, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity article. --Jojit fb 05:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)\
  • Keep or userify. Actually, the fourth, seventh, and sixteenth results of a Google search on my name are from a Philippine lawyer's blog and two Philippine tech blogs, none of which are my property and none of which feature the reposted text Noelle De Guzman speaks of. I won't even bore you with the relevant mentions on succeeding SERPS. -Mike Abundo 04:10:27, March 2, 2006 (UTC).
And even if does assert notability; it is not a proper conduct here in Wikipedia to write anything about your own biography. See Wikipedia:Autobiography and also Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines. --Jojit fb 02:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Userfy per Mike Abrundo's own request. (Then delete this as Vanispamcruft.) --Karnesky 07:43, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
    • I think that this matter is already resolved since Mike Abundo agrees to userify it. So please admins, delete and userify. --Jojit fb 02:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Userfy -To Mike, pls read WP:VANITY--Jondel 05:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.