Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middlepunk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Middlepunk

More -punk "genres". No evidence that this term is other than a neologism not in real use. Delete. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 07:13, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. --King of All the Franks 07:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete There are no citeable sources and the content is not verifiable. This, like many of the other articles, appears to exist to fill in a perceived gap in an x-punk literary genre timeline without having any works that can be attributed to it. Avogadro94 14:54, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete As with the others. --Ccranium 15:06, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Unencyclopedic. NN, UV. - EurekaLott 15:23, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This entry has the same problems as the other specious "-punk" entries. redfox 15:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Agreed, same as the other entries. UltimateXiphias 23:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Interesting crowd here. rodii 20:47, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Being the author of this article I wish it to be deleted. Piecraft 21:47, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all this punkcruft. We should have listed all of these into a consolidated AfD. Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 03:02, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.