Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midas Stalane LLC
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Midas Stalane LLC
Contested prod. Original prod said "Apparent surreptitious advertisement for painter's commercial website. Painter fails WP:BIO; company fails WP:CORP—both returning zero Google hits; website has an Alexa ranking of "no data". Article appears to violate WP:COI, being created by editor with name of website/painter--Fuhghettaboutit 07:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC)" Khatru2 03:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per me:-) And thanks for the afd Kahtru.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 05:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete This one gets high marks for the zero hits on Google. Maybe they mis-spelled the name? Out!!! --Brianyoumans 05:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, unsourced/unverified/spam. NawlinWiki 14:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears to be a WP:VANITY piece created by the subject. Fails WP:BIO for notability QuiteUnusual 18:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Dont Delete - I put the page on and I am not the artist though I do work for the company. We took all reference to the external link off - the website previously refered to is no longer commerical - just informative - Its a new URL and Google only crawled it a few days ago. Anything else I need to do to keep this page from being deleted? Apologies but I am new at this also.
Hi there, OK Google now has the homepage (link since deleted) www.stalane.com as #1 for Midas Stalane LLC
- Delete Looks purely commercial to me; the site is a slim site clearly geared toward sales, with next to no info. Google finds only that site and the Wiki. - Corporal Tunnel 01:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.