Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mick Ferraro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mick Ferraro

Mick Ferraro (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A non notable fashion designer. The article is unsourced and reads like a promotional piece rather than an encyclopedic article. Was tagged with a prod and was contested by the author. The author's reasons for contesting the prod are on the talk page. However, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The article could be created when the subject is the subject of this expected future publicity. Mattinbgn/ talk 04:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Zero sources. Article offers not the slightest bit of evidence that this person is notable. Mwelch 06:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless requested citations can be provided - which will assert notability.Garrie 12:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Unverifiable not notable crystalballery, per nom. Sarah 14:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete He can be rewritten when he finishes up and comes into the news. KP Botany 00:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, I am not convinced that this person is notable. Lankiveil 09:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete with no prejudice against recreation if the predictions on the talk page come true and this does indeed become a notable fashion label. JavaTenor 16:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Second the no prejudice, just to remind anyone should this issue arise again with more information on the designer or his label. KP Botany 18:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No notability established. Acalamari 18:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.