Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael urbik

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 15:31, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Michael urbik

Not notable. You (Talk) 17:38, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Delete He's done some voluteer work and been mentioned in some local newspapers. Nice guy, but not worthy of an article. Sonic Mew 17:48, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nn vanity. Always with a picture... There's also an article for his dad, Jerry Urbik, also seems nn. --Etacar11 18:35, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I put Jerry Urbik on vfd also. You (Talk) 18:39, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Comment the creator of this page vandalized both my and You's user pages, with VfD notices. Not good. --Etacar11 23:16, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• And the creator also removed this page from the VfD log. --Etacar11 23:31, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Just isn't notable. -- Captain Disdain 00:03, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity, created by a relative or himself or something, as shown by the author's contribs and VFD votes. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 00:26, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, along with the other 2.Splash 00:41, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity page.--Kross 02:07, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. JamesBurns 06:34, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Pavel Vozenilek 23:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.