Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tenenbaum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 18:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Tenenbaum

Unsourced article about a candidate in a local election in the US. Was tagged for speedy deletion, CSD-A7. However, whilst failing to assert notability for the candidate himself, I'm unsure on AfD precedent for candidates in US elections, so I'm happier to send it here for discussion. Technical nomination only, so no opinion from me.➨ ЯEDVERS 09:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Note to closing admin: there is a redirect to this article at Michael tenenbaum that has some talk page activity. Consideration should be given to this. Thanks! ➨ ЯEDVERS 09:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete only notability is that he has been campaigning for congress, don't think that's enough to meet WP:BIO. Given the comment on the talk page, I might even suspect that the article was created to support his campaign. -- Koffieyahoo 09:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: unelected congressmen are rarely notable. The area is not that far from where I live and I've never heard of him. If he is elected, an article of this size can be written in a few minutes. -- Kjkolb 10:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unelected, unsourced, contains crystal balling language. Just zis Guy you know? 13:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BIO, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Coredesat talk 19:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.