Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Singleton

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk July 3, 2005 21:40 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Singleton

Deus Homoni added {{subst:vfd}} to this article on June 16th, but didn't create the subpage. I am completing the process now. --Canderson7 01:44, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep - Informative. (Unsigned vote by 24.210.54.156.)
• Delete. Article fails to establish notability. Pburka 01:51, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete looks like vanity. Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 02:17, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity, not notable. Cleduc 03:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Unless it gives some reason for being notable... Redwolf24 06:24, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity, no suggestion of notability. -Eisnel 09:43, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nn DS1953 18:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Unencyclopedic. Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox -LostAccount 18:47, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn vanity. --Etacar11 19:57, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. -- Jonel | Speak 04:17, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete (Sorry for not creating the subpage) yeah, It fails to establish notablity; as far as I can see it's a vanity page. Deus Homoni 13:05, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity -Harmil 01:30, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanitycruft. ComCat 30 June 2005 19:22 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.