The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DeleteJtkieferT | C | @ ---- 23:48, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity. --Revolución(talk) 23:40, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
comment I donno, it's notable that employee theft is apparently legal in some situations. This material deserves to be kept, but merged into an article on white collar crime, or some such. Pete.Hurd 05:20, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete - vanity. B.Wind 08:39, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.