Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael McLarney
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete — I would not say that the voting below represents a consensus (3 votes delete, 1 vote keep). However, as the original creator of the article expressed a wish that it be deleted, I am inclined to follow that lead. If this article can be recreated with substance in the future, it might be a keeper. --Gareth Hughes 18:23, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Michael McLarney
Vanity, nn. Delete --Image:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 23:09, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep notable enough. Xoloz 12:39, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete We have to ask: how much could be said about him? Directing a small, new film festival isn't much. The talk show is the only thing that could be considered notable, and that was on a community cable channel, and apparently short-lived. For the purposes of Wikipedia, Mr. McLarney is not a notable person. -DDerby-(talk) 03:30, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete As the creator of the article, I will support the wiki community in its (more impartial) decision. The consensus seems to be "delete". Carolynparrishfan 13:42, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Hmmmm, hard call. He's not someone I've personally heard of, but being program director of a film festival, even a small one, doesn't put him far outside of my keep/delete greyzone. I could potentially be persuaded to vote keep if the article were a bit longer and told me more about him. (However, what high schools his kids attend is information that absolutely doesn't belong here at all.) Carolynparrishfan, is there more that can be said? Is the article expandable? No vote at present; when we approach closing date, I'll vote one way or the other based on whether the article's been convincingly expanded. Bearcat 19:38, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.