Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Laskow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Laskow

Procedural nomination to complete process - neutral; nominator's commnets "Wikipedia is not a advertising service for companies, people and friends. WIKIPEDIA is an ENCYCLOPEDIA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dep. Garcia (talk • contribs) " Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 21:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:VSCA. ColourBurst 00:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 15:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

• keep - has 13700 google results, and 13 in newsbank. --mathewguiver 21:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Someone needs to source it. Arbusto 00:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless reliable sources can be found for the claims to notability in the article. A Google search for "michael laskow" "eric clapton", for example, yields lots of non-reliable sources that say he has "worked with" Eric Clapton. And aside from the non-reliability of the sources, the exact nature of this "work" is not made clear, which is suspicious. With respect to Google hits for just "michael laskow", this suggests he has at most 278 unique Google hits. Pan Dan 00:12, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverified. Heimstern Läufer 03:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.