Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Krueger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per SNOW. PeaceNT 15:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Krueger

Michael Krueger (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Doesn't appear notable, and the article creator has the same name as one of Mr. Krueger's websites, suggesting the article may be autobiographical or promotional. ―Wmahan. 00:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Non-notable webmaster. the_undertow talk 03:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable. HeirloomGardener 03:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable. --Random Say it here! 03:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: Non-notable human. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per above. Josh 12:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The article does seem to be promotional, although if the article focused more on the books he wrote and any impact they had it may be worth keeping. --Ozgod 14:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Subject is not noteworthy. AlphaEta 17:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Does not have any notability. Checked google and could not find much/anything about this person. Checked Amazon and could not find any author Michael Krueger. With the creater of the page having the same name as the name of his website, this was created either by himself (COI right there), or an employee/friend/whatever, and could deem this is promotional. --sumnjim talk with me·changes 18:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete NN, fails WP:BIO. I'd be greatly surprised if this isn't a WP:COI case as well. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.