Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Gatheright

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. — Trilobite (Talk) 14:54, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Gatheright

As written, it is nothing more than someone's testimonial for a deceased friend. Wikepedia is obviously not the place for such things, and to be honest, I'm genuinely shocked that it has lasted this long (created November 2004). And, to be safe, as aparently the subject was some kind of P-funk artist, google only comes up with just 38 hits, most of them cut-and-paste info. DELETE for non-notability, DELETE for patent nonsense in relation to wikipedia's mission. Jeffrey O. Gustafson 02:54, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, Wikipedia is not a memorial. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ] 03:08, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy if at all possible. Otherwise, delete. -- BD2412 ^talk 03:25, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
• Delete Not a memorial. --Xcali 04:47, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Indeed. --Mysidia 07:34, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a memorial. JamesBurns 08:11, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a memorial. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:27, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.