Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Champion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Champion

This article was deleted following an AfD last year. The creator of that first article has written a new article on the same topic, mostly covering the same points. However, it is not identical to the previous article. The rewrite makes no new assertions of notability, and even notes that Champion no longer holds the two elected positions he previously did. Warofdreams talk 18:55, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Smells of vanity -Nv8200p talk 18:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment if the positions make him worthy of an article, having lost them doesn't count against him - this is an encyclopaedia, not a news service. You don't "lose" encyclopaedic value. That said, I haven't formulated an opinion on the encyclopaedic value. WilyD 19:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Okay, "Delete' no reliable, third party sources. WilyD 19:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable, unnotable. Valrith 21:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable, unnotable. I was a KCL student at this time and anyone (like me) who wasn't seriously into the intricacies of student union politics and sub-politics won't have come across him. --Cloth Ears 14:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.