Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Bonani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Bonani

Michael Bonani (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Apparently non-notable scientist; fails WP:PROF/WP:BIO due to a lack of substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources. See also the related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-notable EPFL robots. Sandstein (talk) 00:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: Non notable [1]. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

• Weak delete Delete. Seems to be doing ok for his relatively junior level of academic seniority but not enough to stand out for his own works yet. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Looks like a promising grad student. We'll have to see how he does once he's on his own (years from now, after he's done a postdoc....) --Crusio (talk) 08:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete per David Eppstein and Crusio, as a promising but not quite there academic. Bearian (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.