Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Lee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. Rje 23:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mia Lee
Tiny article about a member of Before Dark, a group that meets WP:MUSIC but just barely. Contested prod. I doubt most the material is verifiable. Google search turned up a tv.com entry (unreliable; anyone can edit it), and some forum threads, and the CV of Mia's former tutor [1]. Delete Mangojuicetalk 02:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Ageo020 02:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- This site confirms everything author said: freewebs.com/only_mia —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.69.127.121 (talk • contribs) .
- Do NOT DELETE If this person is fighting so hard to keep the page alive, let ti stay —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.16.84.21 (talk • contribs) .
- Should not be deleted. Information is verifiable, as it was all taken from the pamphlet that came with her CD. She thanked her younger siblings, Dana and Autumn, and her mother Michelle Lee, whom she explained was her manager. Also, in the pamphlet she is listed as Mia "Theodore" Lee. I took this as a play on the three chipmunks, as Arike was listed as Alvin and Jeni was listed under the name Simon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indiaz (talk • contribs)
- Delete: Unverifiable. The author may be right, but there is no proof and no method of obtaining it. Were it to be verifiable, the biography itself does not meet the minimum threshold. Geogre 20:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Don't delete. Article can be fattend up and neutralized to meet code. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.16.84.21 (talk • contribs) .
- Note to closing admin: I suspect the anons and Indiaz are the same user; if you look at their contributions, none of them added their comments at the bottom. The coincidence is too much for me to assume they're different. Mangojuicetalk 21:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I imagine the verifiability claims might be overcome, but I don't think she is independently notable. --Karnesky 22:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.