Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mezzo-Pazzo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mezzo-Pazzo

I'm not even going to pretend to research this. Take a look at the article and just vote delete. It's so easy. - Hahnchen 01:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete no evidence of notability--Xrblsnggt 02:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Glad to oblige, since not many google hits reference the actual flash cartoon and it's also ranked some #66000ish on newgrounds. As a contrast, There She Is!! is ranked 9th/109th (score/popularity) on the same site. --ColourBurst 02:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep New article, allow for organic expansion! -- Librarianofages 02:16, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: "Allow for organic expansion" always seems to mean "Wait, it might become notable someday." Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Fan-1967 02:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete there's nothing to expand. It's some guy's flash cartoon. The article doesn't even make any sense, but I suspect that's derivative from the subject matter. Opabinia regalis 02:24, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Zos 02:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete because flergle. Danny Lilithborne 03:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no evidence of notability. "Organic expansion" is only useful if the subject is encyclopedic in the first place. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Comixpedia is the correct place for this kind of thing.Perhaps a notice could be placed on the list of webcomics page pointing out this alternative wiki outlet Bwithh 03:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Comixpedia is for sequential art, not animation. This is a flash cartoon, not a webcomic. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 11:24, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not even notable on Newgrounds. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Rob 13:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as this does not meet WP:WEB and waiting for the day it may be would violate WP:NOT.--Isotope23 16:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Even with the insightful nom, I was still obligated to check out the article before voting. Wow. WP:WEB Alphachimp ^talk 23:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.