Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metroplex Chapel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 05:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Metroplex Chapel

Metroplex Chapel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Lack of notability. After the first sentence, the article deals with minutia that only members of the church would need to know. Antonrojo 15:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

(Note: The above is the original nominator's rationale from back in September, which somehow got blanked along the way. I restored it. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC))

  • Delete. This obviously does not meet notability requirements and would never be found in an encyclopedia. Few, if any, local churches would. Aepoutre 19:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Relisting, this discussion page somehow went listed on September 15, where it patiently waited for comments... Tizio 18:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • delete - appears in no reliable sources, not even local news? --Rocksanddirt (talk) 19:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no evidence of notability, reads like an ad. Powers T 19:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as advertising, fails WP:RS too. By the way, is this the longest that an AfD's ever been open? Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, G11 Pretty blatant advertising. Blueboy96 20:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Poor thing, languishing all that time with no attention. Delete as advertising. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.