Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metrologic Instruments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. NawlinWiki 17:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Metrologic Instruments

Doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP. Blatant spam/advertising (creator's username is "Metrologic"). Prod removed by author without comment. -- Merope ^{Talk to me}/_{Review me} 15:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

• This entry is not spam or advertising. It is purely informational and therefore should not be deleted.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Metrologic (talk • contribs)
• Keep - Company passes every single criterion of WP:CORP, not really even worth arguing details. My Alt Account 15:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Furthermore, page doesn't rank very high on my ad/spam meter (hey, where are all the links? where do I buy? What's your product pricing?) and the information is pretty good. Would be nice for someone to go through and add cites; anything that derives from SEC filings would be acceptable even though those are written by the company. My Alt Account 16:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Followup - I put a note on User:Metrologic's user page letting him know what good work he's doing ('cause it's true) and suggesting he pull in references (sort of cheeky, we can do it as easily as he can). I also put a {{references}} tag on the article. I think we can close the AfD now, except for the whole consensus thing. Do I hear a consensus? My Alt Account 16:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I withdraw the nomination. The earlier version of the article (which was prodded) was much more spammy than this current version. I apologize for not noticing the change of the article in conjunction with the removal of the {{prod}} tag. -- Merope 17:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

As a fast-on-the-trigger deletionist, I think the whole thing is understandable, and anyway, no harm no foul. My Alt Account 17:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.