Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Methetherial
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Merge with Frederic William Henry Myers. Deathphoenix 15:50, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Methetherial
Insubstantial dicdef for a term which yields 100 results in Google. Delete. --Sn0wflake 16:56, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The vast majority of those 100-odd hits are Wikipedia mirrors, or random lists of words. If it's relevent, it could be added to the Frederic William Henry Myers article, but I don't personally see the need. — Asbestos | Talk 19:46, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, expand. The wisdom of the world is not to be found exclusively on Google. -- BD2412 talk 20:20, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
-
- Expansion is not only unlikely, but seems to be pointless, since the term is, apparently, used by that author alone, and thus is not notable enough to have an article on the Wikipedia. --Sn0wflake 22:17, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with BD2412, Interpellation Klonimus 08:11, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
- Merge into Frederic William Henry Myers. The term doesn't appear to have much relevance beyond his writings. (Or perhaps BD2412 or Klonimus can show us some.) --Dcfleck 17:02, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
- Merge unless relevance outside Myers' writings can be demonstrated. carmeld1 23:26, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- Merge into Frederic William Henry Myers. JamesBurns 08:04, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.