Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Messy Stench

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Chick Bowen 06:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Messy Stench

Messy Stench (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Seems to fail WP:N. The article itself is full of weasel phrases . . . for example, "Her show is notorious . . .." but the only sources are two of her personal websites and her MySpace page. janejellyroll 03:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, very little reason to believe subject is notable, no assertions in article are sourced. Seraphimblade 04:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Neutral. I've found some interviews with her [1] [2][3], but I'm not sure if these sources are reliable enough to assert notability for this young lady. --Charlene 14:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. If notability could be better asserted, I could see keeping this. Is the radio show somehow notable? Charlene, I share your doubt about whether those sources are reliable enough. delldot | talk 04:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment. 24.210.149.163 made an edit to this article without adding text but with an edit summary that read: "I am as of now writing an article of Messy Stench by the Wikipedia guidelines; please refrain from deletion until I am finished and it is posted. Thank you." [4] delldot | talk 20:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Charlene's references do establish more reliable sources than the nom's concerns of only personal websites and her myspace page being used as references. --Oakshade 05:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Charlene's links demonstrate she exists, but I'm not convinced they are compliant with WP:RS... Addhoc 19:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.