Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesh Computers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 06:40, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mesh Computers

Article is about an English computer maker which appears to fail WP:CORP. The only incoming link to the article is a line in Mesh (disambiguation) added by the article's author. - squibix(talk) 18:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

  • week keep one of the better known UK computer makers. --Salix alba (talk) 01:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Titoxd(?!? - help us) 00:59, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. Royboycrashfan 01:32, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep per User:Pfafrich --kingboyk 01:50, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unless someone has a better reason for keeping this than that's its virtually adcruft for "one of the better known UK computer makers" who nevertheless fail WP:CORP. KillerChihuahua?!? 01:59, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • This looks like another one that will test the "it's not a vote" aspect of AfD. Google news says nothing, and the links from the vanilla Google search are mostly just product reviews and thus do not indicate notability. This link indicates that there may be something in it, but for right now, delete as not notable and failing WP:CORP. - brenneman(t)(c) 02:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Brenneman. Too small to be notable. Dr Debug (Talk) 04:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. No indication why the company would meet WP:CORP. (As an aside, I've lived in Britain for ten years now and never saw one single box manufactured by those people anywhere.) Pilatus 05:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.