Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meritus Mandarin Singapore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep - no other arguments for deletion. --Coredesat 07:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Meritus Mandarin Singapore

Meritus Mandarin Singapore (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Procedural nom to list separately the various hotels bundled together in an earlier nomination. Rationale for deletion remains insufficient notability and of no encyclopedic value (see WP:NOT#TRAVEL). Pascal.Tesson 19:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep - The tallest building in the centre of swanky Orchard Road since its completion, the flagship hotel of a major hotel chain, features the tallest revolving restaurant in the country and another famous restaurant serving the de-facto national dish of Singapore, and the article forgets to mention that it also happens to be the de-facto venue for many functions by the Government of Singapore. Non-notable? Hardly.--Huaiwei 13:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment Non-notable? Possibly not. Totally unreferenced? Absolutely. To repeat here: Articles that do not cite reliable published sources are likely to be deleted. --Russavia 01:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Wonder if you are acquinted with this website enough to realise there are alternatives to AFDs, and there are other outlets available for individuals who are out to be disruptive.--Huaiwei 06:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, as per above. —Sengkang 15:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - per Huaiwei. Claims to notability inlcuding housing the tallest revolving restaurant in Singapore, has received awards from reputable and notable organizations. Re-wording not deletion is required. Luke! 01:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and admonish nominator in the interests of fighting systemic bias. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 12:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.