Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mental prayer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per consensus, almost WP:SNOW. Bearian 21:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mental prayer

Mental prayer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable religious fancruft. Seems to be a synthesis of very POV ideas on a non-notable topic, impossible to verify or make neutral.SpongebobSchwammkopf 06:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep should be fairly easy to verify (and NPOVise), just needs a rewrite by a non-Catholic - or a catholic who understands NPOV. Totnesmartin 12:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep mostly because no attempts have been made to engage any other processes prior to nomination (e.g. the entry talk page has not been used yet by anyone). In fact unless some off wiki communication was had the entry creator (and it seems pretty much sole editor) hasn't even been notified of this AfD. I do think its possible that if something is salvaged from this entry it will probably also have to be renamed.PelleSmith 17:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Needs a lot of NPOV work. But notable. Bacchiad 18:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and rewrite per WP:NPOV ILovePlankton(L—n) 18:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, longstanding terminology with plenty of references; and nominator needs to reconsider WP:CIVIL. --Dhartung | Talk 22:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Yes certainly, but it does need to be re-written. This is the noms fourt or fifth edit. --Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 23:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. Please be civil or someone might "courtesy blank" this discussion. And I'd hate to see that happen. Burntsauce 22:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.