Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MentalBot

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Conti|✉ 03:41, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] MentalBot

Somewhere between "not notable" and "vanity". There are some 26000 hits for the Beehive Forums, which might merit an article (although not in my opinion). However, the bot itself gets very few hits, and none from the aforementioned article. Nothing links here, and only two edits -- from the same anonymous user -- grace the article. Avriette 01:07, July 11, 2005 (UTC)

• Add "nonsense" to above two reasons. Avriette 01:11, July 11, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. yea, seems kinda pointless and nn to me. In agreement with Avriette -mysekurity 01:37, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonsense. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 02:36, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete whatever the hell it thinks it is. The nominator is too generous: it is nowhere between nn and vanity: it's absurdity from otherwhere. -Splash 04:31, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

I would have said {{db|inspid rubbish}} but probably people would have called me prejudiced, or a deletionist, or whatever. I figured it wasn't a speedy, and that the vfd would bear it out. Last time I thought something was completely deletable, 40mm grenade, the article was vastly expanded within a week. I am generally not generous. Avriette 07:14, July 11, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nonsense. Poli (talk • contribs) 08:33, 2005 July 11 (UTC)
• Delete Nonsense. royblumy 00:21, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.