Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Men and Cats

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Ryan Delaney ^talk 08:12, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Men and Cats

Article appears to be based on a biased internet rumor. If it is real, more citation should be given and it should be merged into cat anyway. Decapod73 02:42, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. I am a cat, and I disagree with the analysis. Sdedeo 05:27, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I am a dog, and I disagree with the analysis. No Account 00:09, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Without citations, this article is just speculation. ManoaChild 05:33, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Absolute garbage. It's even signed. Del.—Encephalon | ζ | Σ
• Delete. No sources provided, unverified, original research. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:29, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. anything good should be merged into cat --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 10:35, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Nothing useful to merge into cat, since it's not only OR, but is the opposite of the few surveys I've seen (ISTR higher proportion of males than females own cats, relative to owning dogs, with differences below significance levels). Basically, this is a load of barse and should be treated as such. Grutness...wha? 14:54, 8 August 2005 (UTC) (co-signed by Nut and Bolt, kittens of this parish)
• Delete - As both a cat owner and a preferrer of intellectual women, I find this fake apparent scientific study interesting, but the fact remains that it is still fake and does not belong at Wikipedia. There are zero google hits for "Aka K. Molitov," so, even if the scientist exists, he or she is not particularly well known, and, as such, is not a credible source.--Frag 20:55, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as personal essay and original research unless good verifiable sources are provided prior to expiration of VfD discussion. There oughta be a law allowing speedy deletion of any article that says "studies have shown" without citing at least a couple of studies... Dpbsmith (talk) 22:53, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete It seems like a POV essay --Dysepsion 05:39, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete OR. My cats agree. --Etacar11 23:40, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• delete. I rather think this is actually a joke. The last sentence reads like a punchline. Sabine's Sunbird 00:42, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.