Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MenNewsDaily

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 00:36, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] MenNewsDaily

Blog with no notability. Delete. JFW | T@lk 12:16, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Too much blogging, too little notability. Delete. Jasonglchu 15:45, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Is this the same thing as "MensNewsDaily"? I recall it coming up a lot during the election, often showing up on GoogleNews. Going purely by a cursory Google search, however, it looks like nothing more than a small, non-notable group of sexually frustrated male bloggers. Delete unless much more evidence of notability can be put forth. Binadot 17:45, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Merge any notable npov content into a conservative section of the masculism article (making sure to note that the site is not representative of masculism as a whole), or at least a link from that page. Also, btw, it's "men's news, not "men news" - MensNewsDaily. The article itself should be deleted though, and should not redirect to masculism, as it is not at all representative of the movement as a whole. Blackcats 19:37, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable blog. JamesBurns 07:15, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Modify it for more balanced (neutral) description of the website. It reads as if a person with a personal vendetta wrote it.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.