Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memorandom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, redirect to Memorandum. Singularity 00:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Memorandom

Memorandom (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable music group. No independent sources provided. Does not meet WP:BAND Mattinbgn\talk 02:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 02:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • If deleted, recreate as redirect to Memorandum as plausible misspelling. No stance on the actual deletion of this article. -- saberwyn 02:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. (Or redirect per Saberwyn above.) Terraxos (talk) 04:17, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as I originally nominated. Original "assertions" of importance are not verifiable and highly suspect. This band is not even close to being notable and has no place at Wikipedia. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, would not appear to meet WP:MUSIC notability criteria. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC).
  • Delete - not even in AllMusic.com, and that is saying something :) -- Mark Chovain 11:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment and question: I've been looking at this article for a few days now, trying to decide if I wanted to nominate it for deletion. My question is, are they signed to a label? Who released their two releases? Corvus cornixtalk 18:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • I've tried finding that out myself. The second CD is apparently available from Amazon, but they don't list the label. I suspect it is an independent release. The UPC is 6890760490616, if that helps anyone.
  • This says, "Tunnel Vision is available from all good record stores through Green Distribution (MGM).". The link itself is a PR release so not reliable, but does anybody know what Green Distribution is? Corvus cornixtalk 23:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Aha, thanks for that link. Based on that, I'm going to have to say delete, they don't have a record label, Green Distribution is just a distributor for bands that have released their own material. Corvus cornixtalk 18:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails this. ~EdGl 23:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.