Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Member count

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox 11:42, 28 May '06

[edit] Member count

Here's another WP:DUH! definition that hasn't been transwikied: a forum's member count is a count of how many members it has. TheProject 19:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete unless someone has some notable history on this term... which I find very unlikely. --Chris (talk) 19:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. --Sunfazer | Talk 19:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Lady Aleena 19:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- It's this sort of thing: A gribby pookle is a pookle that is gribby. that is, it contains no more information than that implied by the title. You need more information to make an encyclopedia article and there's no chance of that here. Reyk _YO!
• Delete unless it becomes more than a dicdef. Ziggurat 22:17, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Somebody wanted to write an article about something and was not very creative. --Cocopuffberman 03:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.