Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melvin and Teddy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. --Rhobite 21:34, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Melvin and Teddy

Subpage of Peanut Foot - badly written article about a non-notable web cartoon. Zetawoof 03:42, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable, fancruft. Megan1967 04:45, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Peanut Foot for details. Zzyzx11 06:08, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Not Notable? It exists, doesn't it? That should make it notable. 70.57.72.83 16:31, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Not everything that exists is notable. Similarly, not everything that is notable actually exists (e.g. unicorn). Delete. Radiant! 18:11, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Huh. Well, you got me there. 70.57.72.83
• Short-running, poorly read web comic. I'll eat my words when its widely read and reasonably well established, until then delete - TB 12:51, 2005 Feb 25 (UTC)
• Delete, as per above. vlad_mv 01:26, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• How come they deleted Peanut Foot but not Melvin and Teddy? 70.57.72.83
  • We're working on it.Zetawoof 05:51, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.