Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Milano
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Melissa Milano
No evidence that subject meets Porn actors notability guidelines. Prod tag was disputed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. No sign of notablity is given in the article. Quite amount of movies, but that's how pornographic actors/actresses are. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites) 02:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep The article needs to be expanded, however she is very notable and passes the Google image test bring over 1000 related images. Only issue is that she lacks a homepage. Valoem talk 04:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I still fail to see how she meets any of the guidelines. Note this quote from Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic_actors):
- The "Google Test": The adult film industry uses Googlebombing to influence rankings on search engines for current performers' names. As a result, the Google test is not suitable to determine the notability of a performer. This is especially the case for performers whose work antedates the Web. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- I understand it seems Google test is not applied to Pornographic performers, however she does pass an image test which many less notable performers do not pass and has respectable filmography. Valoem talk 07:05, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- The "Google Test": The adult film industry uses Googlebombing to influence rankings on search engines for current performers' names. As a result, the Google test is not suitable to determine the notability of a performer. This is especially the case for performers whose work antedates the Web. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I still fail to see how she meets any of the guidelines. Note this quote from Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic_actors):
- Comment. I'm neutral on this one, but please note that Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors) is a proposal only, not a policy. There are therefore no real guidelines to meet apart from WP:BIO, which she may or may not meet. -- Necrothesp 09:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable. Un referenced. Is very probably a vanity page. Exir KamalabadiJoin Esperanza! 13:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough evidence of notability.Gobawoo 16:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: Alyssa Milano? Melissa Milano looks like Alyssa and her name sounds close to Alyssa. Anomo 02:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- And the relevance of that is ... what exactly? Valrith 21:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- I suspect he was suggesting it could be the same person! -- Necrothesp 22:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- And the relevance of that is ... what exactly? Valrith 21:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors), this is what it is for. Having a lot of images on the web is common for porn stars, and 21 or 34 films is not that much, considering that most take 3 days or under to film, and half will be compilations from previous films. Back when it mattered, the dividing line for notability for modern US mainstream porn stars was 100. Find some articles about her, and she'll meet WP:BIO. Otherwise, follow the IAFD or AFDB links, and you will find not hundreds but thousands of other stars just like her. AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.