Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Merida
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Melissa Merida
Google turned up very little on this wrestler. Appears to be a small time wrestler that isn't very known. Also appears to be vanity, since the user that made this is called MeliChaCha. RobJ1981 00:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- This article was created at the recommendation of fans via the internet. Oftentimes independent workers will provide this information on their own, as there isn't much exposure for them via smaller promotions' sites. AWA NJ1 21:11, 24 September 2006 (EST)
- Comment. Wikipedia is NOT the place for articles on people that aren't very notable. Wikipedia also isn't the place to provide exposure for lesser known wrestlers. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of knowledge, not an encyclopedia for any article of non-notable things. RobJ1981 01:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a "promotions' site". Uncle G 08:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete She's attractive, but she doesn't appear to be notable. TJ Spyke 03:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 04:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I believe what AWA up there meant was other wrestling promotions' sites - not that the entry was meant to act as promotional material. Either way, I don't think the article should be deleted on merit that this information is relevant to people like myself who write reviews or might want to know about a performer who I have never seen before, but would want to learn more about. Just a random user's $.02.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.254.71.25 (talk • contribs)
- Delete. No assertion of notability, nor is there any verifiable sources. With the addition of those two elements, then its a keep. AmitDeshwar 00:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.