Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meliorist

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete as a confirmed copyright violation.

Megan1967's revised version will be put in the Transwiki queue to go to Wiktionary. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 23:42, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Meliorist

Dictdef. Inter 10:13, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Claims to be a copyvio, so delete instead of transwiki. (I'm not listing it on WP:CP since I don't have the software mentioned to confirm the copyvio, and can't see any benefit from someone writing a replacement at /Temp.) —Korath (Talk) 12:05, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
• WP:CP is also for suspected copyright problems. And, to be honest, there's little reason to doubt that it is. Whilst I agree that Meliorist/Temp will almost certainly be {{move to wiktionary}}, unless someone comes up with a suitable redirect, the overriding consideration is to stop the publication of copyright violations as soon as possible. I've listed it. Uncle G 16:51, 2005 Feb 4 (UTC)
• Cleanup copyvio and move to Wiktionary. Megan1967 05:31, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. I have modified the article since original VfD to avoid copyvio. Updated possible Wiktionary entry at Meliorist/Temp, for further comments/votes. Megan1967 04:51, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.