Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melchers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep Cobra 02:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Melchers

It's just an obvious example of someone who should have instead been playing around in the sandbox. It details three non-notable names in an unwikified format, and the article title is not one that appears readily salvageable into anything Wikipedia-worthy. Frag 08:47, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

• • I apologize; it was about 4 AM here at the time, and I carelessly did not check the history. I'm changing my vote to a Keep. --Frag
• Delete per nom. Keep, saw vandalized version when I did my original vote. VegaDark 09:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• This is a nice nomination, so I'm rather sad to bring news that it's kinda boneheaded, in its way. The article started off as a disambig, but was vandalised. It's the vandalised version that has been nominated for deletion. I have reverted back to the good one. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep after the revert. --Pboyd04 15:51, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Now it is fixed.Obina 15:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. All three people are notable and the building is notable as well. This is a valid disambiguation. -- SoothingR 21:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.