Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne Beer War

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. There is a suggestion that merging would be appropriate. Joyous 20:54, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Melbourne Beer War

Not notable. There is no such "beer war" in Melbourne or Australia, and a list of pubs owned by a specific company doesn't deserve to be in an encyclopedia. Delete. Somebody in the WWW 23:52, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. What a stupid article, there really is nothing interesting or useful about this article. The list of pubs that are "believed" to be in association with a certain organisation should not be included. -- AxSkov 01:04, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 01:32, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Factual, verifiable, useful and interesting. Very obvious keep - although the article should be renamed as Liquor industry competion in Victoria, and the list of hotels should be removed as speculation. --Centauri 01:50, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn beercruft. Wyss 02:15, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Ummmmmmmmmmm. Beercruft. *slobbers uncontrollably* Delete. Edeans 08:21, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• I can't judge if this is true. If it is, it seems interesting enough. But I don't see why one episode in the competition in one market (beer) in one city (Melbourne) deserves such a long article in an encyclopedia -- yes, even in an encyclopedia that's not printed on paper. (It's hardly as dramatic as beer wars in Prohibition-era Chicago.) Make it a lot more concise, and add the result to Tooheys. In a word, merge. Hoary 05:49, 2005 Jan 8 (UTC)
• I'm with Centauri. I found the article interesting and useful, too. I say, rename, get rid of the list of pubs, and it could use some trimming, as Hoary said. I think it's worthy of its own page. HWelles 07:40, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• the article does contain useful information, which should be merged into the appropriate page or re-writen. Xtra 12:15, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.