Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mel Booth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kirill Lokshin 01:05, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mel Booth

Delete. A sport journalist of a newspaper. The newspaper doesn't even have its own article. Written by an anon user who was blocked an hour ago. *drew 02:54, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

• According to this, the Huddersfield Daily Examiner has a circulation of 82000, meaning that this journalist writing for it satisfies the WP:BIO criterion for published writers. However, there is a significant lack of independent source material on this person. Uncle G 03:32, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• The newspaper now has its own article. Anthony Appleyard 06:35, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. A Google search for (Mel Booth Huddlesfield) does confim that he is a sparts journalist. Whether that makes him notable enough for his own article is a different issue. I'll reserve my vote for the moment. - Dalbury (talk) 18:38, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - a sports journalist on a minor English regional newspaper is non-notable, even if the newspaper itself may be. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ifnord 22:18, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.