Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehdi Foundation International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:SNOW, WP:CSD#G11 and likely WP:CSD#G12. MaxSem 11:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mehdi Foundation International

Mehdi Foundation International (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not sure what to make of this page, but it doesn't sound deserving of its own article. Nyttend 04:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Looks like a hoax and seems pointless. oysterguitarist~Talk 04:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. WP is not a soapbox. Alternatively, reduce to stub, since there are GHits about members being arrested. The "proof" of images of Jesus being visible on the Moon, Mars and the Black Stone of Mecca is mighty convincing though. Just one question: did they use a digital camera or a regular one to take His picture for comparison? Clarityfiend 05:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. WP is not a place for personal essays. Ironically, this article might also be a WP:COPYVIO. Pure POV tripe. --Nonstopdrivel 05:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I don't see anything here that even makes it salvagable as an article. At best this is non-notable POV. 76.174.235.161 06:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Gosh, where to begin? Blatantly promotes a POV, likely copyvio, essay, probable hoax, can't believe it didn't get speedied. Realkyhick 07:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete, essay, possible hoax and the article has never seen NPOV. Elmo 08:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Completely unencyclopaedic. Hilarious 'evidence' of faces appearing on the Moon, Sun, etc... An interesting sociocultural phenomenon, but needs a non-POV editor to write it, not this article. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 08:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Smells like a WP:HOAX, if not that, then completely unencyclopedic. east.718 10:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
• Kill it Reads like propaganda. -N 10:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.