Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghan and Michael Nelson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 05:31, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Meghan and Michael Nelson

Although I haven't seen the series, they are only listed as having appeared on General Hospital on IMDB 1992-'94, in my opinion they're non-notable. Bjelleklang - talk 23:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Babies used as props are not actors, and not notable. If they haven't done anything since, they're not likely to become notable. (Have you considered just prod'ing a whole slew of these, and seeing if anyone tries to contest?) Fan1967 00:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Golfcam 01:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Some anon created dozens of articles about twin kids, whose only claim of notabiity is appearing on random.show. As mentioned in previous events, babies used as props are not actors. WP:BLP applies. Stifle (talk) 00:07, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 03:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.