Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Hauserman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, defaults to keep, as both sides make reasonable arguments. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 14:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Megan Hauserman

Megan Hauserman (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This person does not really fall into the notable category. Other than being one of many many many guests on reality tv shows and posing nude there are no other outside sources to show notability. References to myspace used to indicate fame. Unconfirmed claims contained in page. Redrok84 (talk) 04:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep Subject has notability by winning a reality series. Footnotes on page indicate such, which make the claim far from "unconfirmed". The myspace page is NOT used to indicate fame, but is there as a link. ArcAngel (talk) 13:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
    • You have illustrated my point, she is simply a guest on a reality tv show who happened to be the final guest and is possibly trying to work into the show-biz. There are many winners of reality tv shows every few weeks, but they are not notable, or "worthy of notice." From my understanding and what I have generally seen with reality tv show guests is that there should be a section in the article for the reality tv series the guest appeared on rather than an entire dedicated page. I'm all for summarizing everything on her wiki page in the appropriate reality tv series' pages and Delete her dedicated page. Redrok84 (talk) 02:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
      • Redrok, what's the point, aren't there far more important articles worth editing than making an argument against this one? There are hundreds of dedicated pages for porn actors on Wikipedia, are they any less deserving than this person. By the way, Miss Hauserman's "dabble" into porn isn't referenced on her page. There is already plenty of what I would consider "fluff" on Wiki and I believe that it is by no means in danger of being overrun by the kind of information.

If you want to do something worthwhile, go find pages where some racist revisionist idiot changes factual data to reflect their bizarre beliefs. I find this and other narrow minded garbage again and again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scalhotrod (talk • contribs) 05:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep per "Has had significant roles or been featured multiple times in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions" Xpendersx (talk)
  • Delete as per other delete comments that she does not merit notable status by appearing on a reality tv series along with a billion other girls (and guys). I could not find any sources about notable films, stage performances, or other productions other than reality tv and a few nude photo shoots. Also, I am not a major wikipedian as some people are and I too have had an article deleted - big deal, but I think anything anyone does on wikipedia is "worthwhile" as long as they are not intentionally making bogus pages and also as long as we all contribute unbiased remarks. Jellybean333 (talk) 03:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.