Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meg and Seron
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. JERRY talk contribs 12:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Meg and Seron
a future light novel adventure series. It seems to fail WP:CRYSTAL Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- I dunno. It's a future book by a notable author, and it's set to be published in March 2008 by a notable publishing house. I say keep (assuming that it's true, of course). DS (talk) 15:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- Yes, but is the author notable enough to meet WP:BK#Criteria #5? Can't say I think he does. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- To put things in perspective, this is actually the third part of the same series as Allison (light novel) and Lillia and Treize, which are being made into an anime in the spring, Allison and Lillia. (All these articles need to be expanded, obviously.) Like I said, should have been created when the book was actually out, but it seems like a waste of energy to delete it now and recreate it in two months. Doceirias (talk) 00:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- Okay, THERE'S the key information -- it's being adapted. —Quasirandom (talk) 04:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I would have waited till it was actually out to make the page myself, but no reason to delete it only to make it again in March. Dengeki Bunko releases for Jan-Mar 08. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doceirias (talk • contribs) 19:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. (not by me, though —Quasirandom (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC))
- Delete per nom. Doctorfluffy (talk) 21:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: Satisfies WP:BK criterion #3, in that (per above and Allison and Lillia) it's being adapted as a dramatic work on a nationally televised network. This assertion of notability needs to be added to this and the other articles for the works of this series. As Doceirias notes, it's not hard to find reasonably secure evidence that it is a scheduled book, so WP:CRYSTAL is not a problem. —Quasirandom (talk) 04:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
