Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MeeMix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] MeeMix

MeeMix (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

non notable website Asod123123 (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. In this case, I think the references are enough to demonstrate notability. It sounds interesting, too. --Eastmain (talk) 19:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
• Will the closing admin please also note that the nominator's contributions show him/her to be a single-purpose account user, using it solely to nominate stuff for deletion.--Vox Humana 8' 00:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:WEB. It may be interesting, but it ain't notable yet. External links to online press releases ain't reliable sources! --Orange Mike | Talk 17:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

• Weak Delete I found this from Fox Business about one of their new releases and there seems to be a lot of buzz but I don't think it meets WP:WEB just yet. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 19:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keep per Eastmain. Aardvarkvarkvark (talk) 20:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability. Of the references cited, only the interview might count towards notability, and is still a bit dubious. TechCrunch is a blog. And The only stuff I could find are press releases. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whpq (talk • contribs) 18:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - not enough here to meet WP:WEB. TerriersFan (talk) 19:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.