Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medmania.com

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.Woohookitty 09:49, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Medmania.com

Advertisement. Article does not demonstrate importance of subject Hurricane111 05:48, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - this meets CSD. Rob Church ^{Talk | Desk} 17:37, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn, low google, total vanity. -GregAsche (talk) 01:26, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

One of plenty on 3rd September that need more participation for a useful decision. -Splash 00:01, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per GregAsche Dlyons493 05:01, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete.Advertisment, nonencyclopedic.Voice of All (talk) 06:30, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete agree with VoiceOfAll --Patio 06:42, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete, advertising, no Alexa rank, and a mere 509 Google hits mentioning it a lot of which aren't even relevant. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:56, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - vanity ≈ jossi ≈ 15:55, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - advertising, needs wikification if it was a legit article anyway, and quotes such as "leading provider of Web educational communication services that enable greater productivity and cost-efficiency across academic studies" are clearly false splintax ^(talk) _{16:09, 12 September 2005 (UTC)}
• Delete - unless someone replaces all the babble in this article with facts. -- Klafubra 16:19, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.