Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media institution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Media institution

Media institution (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

With all the other articles we have about the media, this one appears to be redundant in the whole scheme of things. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Dictionary gibberish. Renee 02:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - If someone got to it, it might have a chance at being an okay article, but at the moment, it is completely unreadable. There's probably also a better term for the concept too. Spawn Man 03:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, simply too vague a concept; and by the way, the URL embedded in the article is pr0n spam. --Dhartung | Talk 06:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Dictionary term. • Lawrence Cohen 16:52, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.