Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meatitarians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. There's no way this article on a term that's "starting to spread" is going to be kept. Vegetarians can now relax. :P Kimchi.sg 08:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Meatitarians

Meatitarians are people who it [sic] only/mainly meat. Neologism / made up in school one day nonsense. Sorry to bother you with this but an established editor removed the speedy tag. -- RHaworth 02:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Clear case of "made up in school one day". --IslaySolomon 02:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. Agent 86 02:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Speedy Delete Seems like this should have speedied for nonsense, although that always varies by admin. --NMChico24 03:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Strong delete per CSD-G1, patent complete nonsense. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Note sorry, its not patent nonsense, so I've removed the speedy tag. However...

• Strong Delete Non-notable neologism. Gwernol 03:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete could probably have been PRODed. --Pboyd04 03:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism/nonsense/things made up in school one day. AdamBiswanger1 03:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete, complete non-sense (IIIV 03:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC))
• Delete for the reasons stated above. This is not speediable. - Richardcavell 04:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Should've been speedy delete. Obviously 'one day at school' - why is there a link to rapid transit? -- RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib Reverts} 04:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Rapid transit ref looks like a botched link to Subway (restaurant). Kuru ^talk
• Comment yeah I figured that out too, but was trying to point out how little effort went into the article. -- RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib Reverts} 04:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete very silly. I wish I could say this was Spam, but Spam's meat content is questionable. SM247^{My Talk} 04:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as complete neologism. I think I'll just stick with carnivore. Kuru ^talk 04:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Actually, could this be a BJAODN candidate? --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom TheRingess 05:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• BJ-ify The "scientific classification" burger puts it over the top. ~ trialsanderrors 06:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy speedy speedy delete. Nonsensical...--Tdxiang 06:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.