Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meade Skelton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 21:54, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Meade Skelton

delete - ongoing stupidity --R Lee E

  • Speedy delete candidate for an attempted libel page. ("Attempted" because it's trying to use accusations of homosexuality as an insult.) Geogre 03:30, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and revert to a previous stub. It appears from the history that User:R Lee E is the vandal here. DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:00, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
Hang on. I go back in the history, and, sure enough, this fellow has been vandalizing like a hyperactive teenager, but what he's been vandalizing is just as juvenile, just as inappropriate. No matter how far back, I don't find a valid article in there. Perhaps what we need to be doing is banning about 3 users? Geogre 12:52, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, personal attack. Megan1967 05:03, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Delete, Meade Skelton is a guy who posts on the IMDB Soapbox message board. He's not important enough to merit an entry. It's just a silly feud between him and some other people he irritates with inflammatory comments.

  • Delete--nixie 06:53, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. No indication of notability. Capitalistroadster 00:43, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. Vandal sandbox. jni 06:26, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
  • sorry - I do not want to be banned, and that was the wrong way to handle it. My apologies. It won't happen again.R Lee E 06:27, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.