Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McMUN
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 22:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] McMUN
Probable vanity article on one of hundreds of Model UN conferences held around north america annually. Makes no claim to notability besides weasel words. Prod removed by anonIP. Chabuk [ T • C ] 23:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: If not kept, should be a merge and redirect to Model United Nations rather than deletion. If kept, overly detailed information such as names of committee chairs should be truncated. Newyorkbrad 23:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. GreenJoe 02:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Most committees run at any Model UN conference, third largest in the world by number of delegates Bobthefifth 04:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment And of course you have a verifiable source for that claim? -- Chabuk [ T • C ] 04:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete per nom and agree with User:Newyorkbrad. Seems no more notable than the other hundreds of model UNs (which also don't get WP articles). --Raeven0 04:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I've voted to delete dozens of other mun conference articles, but McMUN is one of the truly notable ones around. McMUN is one of the largest and most prestigious conferences around the world, attracting not only a large amount of delegates but also corporate sponsorships. Nonetheless, I recognize that there are verifiability issues -- most conferences are not picked up by news media. Perhaps there needs to be a notability standard drafted for model un conferences. I also think that personnel information should be removed pending a keep as per Newyorkbrad. Mystache 02:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.