Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McClintock (disambiguation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirected to McClintock. FCYTravis 6 July 2005 00:03 (UTC)

[edit] McClintock (disambiguation)

Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Reason given was "unnecessary disambig page - articles have two differnt titles". McClintock is already a disambig page. — Gwalla | Talk 01:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep. Useful disambiguation page. Pburka 02:18, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. I don't understand the reason for the nomination. 23skidoo 02:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: What don't you understand about it? It's a redundant and pointless disambig. — Gwalla | Talk 02:55, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • This nomination appears to be incorrect. It points at McClintock when the nominated page is actually McClintock (disambiguation). I vote to keep McClintock and delete McClintock (disambiguation). Pburka 03:18, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: Ah, thanks for pointing that out. Fixed now. Yes, the fate of McClintock is not at issue here. — Gwalla | Talk 04:29, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - As said, disambig page already exists at McClintock. -- Cabhan 05:34, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, there is no point here. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 06:03, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to McClintock seems simpler, but Delete is OK too. -Eisnel 09:46, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete unnecessary with McClintock already a dab. DoubleBlue (Talk) 14:25, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Redirect to McClintock. There is, I have discovered, a very good reason to keep "Foo (disambiguation)" pages that point at "Foo", which happens to be a disambig page - it makes it easier to sort out and clean up erroneous links to disambig pages, by setting aside instances where the link is actually intended to point to the disambig. -- BD2412 talk 16:54, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
  • Redirect to McClintock. — RJH 18:29, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.