Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximillian Bryant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Maximillian Bryant

Vanity, no information other than picture which should probably also be deleted Xtra 08:42, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment: Usually I advocate giving articles more than 20 minutes between creation and nomination for deletion, but this one doesn't look to be legit. Tagged as {{db-empty}}. — Adrian Lamo ·· 08:47, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Gah. No longer empty, still not a real article. — Adrian Lamo ·· 08:59, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete totally unencyclopedic and a blatant hoax, with elements of a vanity page. Bobby1011 09:20, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, unencyclopaedic vanity hoax. --Terence Ong 11:15, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete get a blog! Camillus (talk) 14:36, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Wikipedia is not for self promotion! Tawker 04:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - NN-bio? Fails WP:BIO --lightdarkness (talk) 05:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Possible candidate to userfy (if requested). Labor Students could also use a cleanup (so as not to encourage similar n-n bios, I think.--Karnesky 07:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Is this the same as Max Bryant, which was just speedied? And why was that article speedied when only one deletion is shown in Special:Log&type=delete&page=Max_Bryant? --Karnesky 05:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Apparently it is. That was speedied under CSD A7 (and an apparently mistaken accusation of "recreation of deleted material"). I suppose this should have the same fate. Speedy delete. --Karnesky 06:43, 25 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.